The substitute rule, introduced in 2011, has long been a topic of debate within the football community, with questions raised about its relevance in the modern game. Scott believes that in 2024, the rule is unnecessary and only serves to complicate matters for players and coaching staff.
Originally intended to address in-game injuries and concussions, the sub-rule quickly became a strategic tool for clubs to manipulate, leading to concerns about its integrity. Scott advocates for its removal, arguing that it hinders rather than helps clubs.
Echoing Scott’s sentiments, Hawthorn coach Sam Mitchell also supports the removal of the sub-rule, emphasizing the tactical advantages that a five-player interchange bench could offer. Mitchell sees the potential for strategic depth and excitement with a larger bench, enhancing the game’s dynamics.
Both coaches highlight the challenges and frustrations associated with the current sub-rule, particularly its impact on player welfare and tactical gameplay. They believe that reverting to a five-player bench system would simplify the game and provide a more equitable playing field for all teams.
The ongoing debate surrounding the sub-rule underscores the need for continued discussion and potential reforms within the AFL. As clubs push for change, the league must carefully consider the implications of any alterations to ensure the integrity and fairness of the sport are upheld.